Clinical outcomes with vutrisiran in transthyretin amyloidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Authors

  • Faizan Ahmed Department of Medicine, Jersey Shore University Medical Centre, Hackensack Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ, USA
  • Faseeh Haider Department of Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Ramsha Ali University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • Ayesha Zulfiqar Dow University of Health and Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Haider Hussain Shah Bayhealth Hospital, Kent Campus, Dover, DE, USA
  • Tooba Nihaal Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Areej Dar Shaikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al-Nahyan Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Maliha Khalid Jinnah Sindh Medical University
  • Saman Rauf Department of Medicine, Fatima Jinnah Medical University Lahore Pakistan
  • Noor ul Ain Saleem FMH College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Hassan Farooq Ameer ud Din Medical College
  • Haris Bin Tahir Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Swapnil Patel Department of Internal Medicine, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ, USA
  • Mohammad Hossain 1. Department of Medicine, Jersey Shore University Medical Centre, Hackensack Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ, USA
  • Fawaz Alenezi Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21542/gcsp.2026.25

Abstract

Background: Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is a progressive disease that causes a restrictive cardiomyopathy. Vutrisiran, a subcutaneous RNA interference (RNAi) therapy, is an approved treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates its efficacy and safety with respect to transthyretin (TTR) reduction, functional capacity, quality of life, mortality, and adverse events.

Methods: We identified 1,032 records, of which three randomized controlled trials — HELIOS-A, HELIOS-B, and a Phase 1 study — comprising 976 participants (508 vutrisiran; 468 comparator) met the inclusion criteria. Comparator participants received placebo, patisiran (an active reference comparator in HELIOS-A), or external placebo from the APOLLO trial. Outcomes assessed were TTR reduction, functional capacity, quality of life, mortality, and adverse events, pooled using random-effects models reporting mean differences and risk ratios.

Results: Vutrisiran achieved a rapid, durable TTR reduction of up to 97% in healthy volunteers at the highest dose, and a sustained steady-state reduction in the HELIOS-A and HELIOS-B trials. QoL outcomes showed a protective effect of vutrisiran, with slowed deterioration in the intervention group. Functional outcomes (10-MWT, 6-MWT) suggested slower decline in mobility and functional capacity. Mortality showed a non-significant reduction (RR 0.51; p=0.29; I²=62%), with most deaths considered unrelated to treatment. The safety analysis showed fewer falls (RR 0.62; p=0.001; I²=0%) but no significant difference in overall adverse events (AEs) (RR 1.01; p=0.76) or serious AEs (RR 0.82; p=0.23). A sensitivity analysis supported the adverse-event findings.

Conclusions: Vutrisiran consistently suppressed TTR and showed signals of benefit in quality of life, function, and mortality, though most of these outcomes did not reach statistical significance. It reduced fall risk without increasing adverse events, indicating a favourable safety profile. Larger, long-term RCTs are needed to confirm survival and functional benefits.

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-29

Issue

Section

Review articles